This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch RFC] SH: -fstack-protector support


On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 03:16:28PM +0100, Joern RENNECKE wrote:
> >>>This pattern, if defined, compares a @code{Pmode} value from the
> >>>memory in operand 1 with the memory in operand 0 without leaving the
> >>>value in a register afterward and branches to operand 2 if the values
> >>>weren't equal.
> >>>   ^^^
> >>>The last line should be "were equal", shouldn't it?  i386 and ppc
> >>>implementations do so.
> >
> >operand2 is label before the call to __stack_chk_fail{,_local}, so of 
> >course
> > 
> >
> No, it's after the call.

Oops, sorry, you're right.  Then s/n't// in md.texi should be done.
Will one of you post a patch for this or should I?

	Jakub


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]