This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Complex MEM adjust_address instead of subreg (PR middle-end/21742)


On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 06:25:35PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> 	You want this fixed in {read,write}_complex_part(), not loosening
> the restriction for the MEM case in simplify_subreg(), right?

Yes.

> 	You want the updated patch to use adjust_address_nv(), allowed to
> fail, falling back to {extract,store}_bit_field(), right?

Not exactly; adjust_address_nv will never fail.


r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]