This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Stack protector ppc/ppc64 support

From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:28:13 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stack protector ppc/ppc64 support
References: <20050624225728.GP22349@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <200506262248.j5QMmg010714@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20050627072743.GD15087@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <200506271436.j5REa4028768@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20050628162242.GO15087@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

>>>>> Jakub Jelinek writes:

Jakub> So, do you prefer following patch instead of the one I sent before?
Jakub> Or another variant, which would always use the 5 insn sequence
Jakub> for stack_protect_test<mode>, unless optimize_size?

	Please use the earlier version of the patch with non-cr0
alternative.

Thanks, David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Stack protector ppc/ppc64 support
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

References:
- [PATCH] Stack protector ppc/ppc64 support
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Stack protector ppc/ppc64 support
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [PATCH] Stack protector ppc/ppc64 support
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Stack protector ppc/ppc64 support
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [PATCH] Stack protector ppc/ppc64 support
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]