This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, committed] PPC405 atomic support (PR target/21760)
My main reason for working on PPC405CR is because the processor
erratum previously was supported and the recent changes created a
regression. If others will not fix the problem, it falls to me and I am
trying to work around the problem and move on.
PowerPC atomic support can be improved on a longer timeframe. I
have other projects I want to complete.
PPC405CR options I have dismissed include:
2) first class processor using target_flags.
3) separate option like rs6000_isel.
PPC405CR erratum support is not worth the level of attention this
discussion is generating.