This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [gfortran] I/O of large integer and real kinds, round 2
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: FX Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
- Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, patch <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 13:03:36 -0700
- Subject: Re: [gfortran] I/O of large integer and real kinds, round 2
- References: <42A4C151.firstname.lastname@example.org> <42A7596E.email@example.com> <42A7761C.firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 12:50:04AM +0200, FX Coudert wrote:
> >Built, tested and regtested on:
> > - i686-linux, which has real(10)
> > - i386-freebsd
> > - sparc-solaris, which has real(16)
> > - x86_64-linux, which has real(10) and integer(16)
> > - alpha-linux, which has integer(16)
> >OK for mainline? (and should it be backported to 4.0, too?)
I finally got my system up and running again. I went to apply
your patch and got
Patching file libgfortran/io/read.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 43.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 73.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 124.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 190.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 289.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 302.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 351.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 377.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 390.
Hunk #10 succeeded at 488.
Hunk #11 failed at 536.
Patching file libgfortran/io/transfer.c using Plan A...
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y] n
Apply anyway? [n] n
Hunk #1 ignored at 160.
Hunk #2 ignored at 213.
Hunk #3 ignored at 675.
Hunk #4 ignored at 704.
4 out of 4 hunks ignored--saving rejects to libgfortran/io/transfer.c.rej
Note, I deleted all files in my gcc41/libgfortran tree and grab
fresh sources from cvs. I know its a pain, but can you send me
a new diff for libgfortran portion?