This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [gfortran testsuite, committed] Re: gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90
Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Tobias Schlüter wrote:
>>Mark, since you probably don't know precisely what we're talking about: a few
>>days ago I introduced testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90 together with a
> It is OK to fix this before 4.0.1, but please be careful not to do
> anything too destabilizing; it would be bad to introduce major gfortran
> bugs in the hope of eliminating a spurious testsuite failure, for example.
I've committed Jakub's first patch, which can be found here
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-06/msg00138.html>. This should leave the
FORALL statement slightly less broken than before, and therefore shouldn't be
destabilizing. On the mainline I also un-XFAILed gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90 again.