This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Kill quadratic bottleneck in duplicate_eh_regions


Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> wrote:

>> I think there is agreement that VEC is uniformly better than VARRAY,
>> and we are trying to move away from VARRAY replacing all occurrences
>> with VEC. So you should not probably introduce new uses.
>
> Hmm, what is the plan here?  I tought we were using VECs for fixed
> size stuff or cases where we have very many of small sized arrays...  I can
> re-do the patch for VEC API if we are dropping VARRAYs completelly (I
> was never varray friend)...

I am not aware of any limitation or inefficence of VEC which should limit its
use for dynamically-sized use cases. I believe VEC is superior to VARRAY in all
regards (including being type safe).

Giovanni Bajo


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]