This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [rs6000] Don't emit libcall notes around TLS address

From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, dje at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 00:07:32 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [rs6000] Don't emit libcall notes around TLS address
References: <200506111630.49106.stevenb@suse.de> <20050611213426.GA25628@redhat.com> <20050611213600.GB25628@redhat.com>

On Jun 11, 2005 11:36 PM, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 02:34:26PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > This is not ok.
> 
> ... without coming up with a replacement scheme.  You'll find that
> pretty much all of the TLS implementations share this libcall trait.

I'm willing to look for a replacement, but I have no idea when this
code is actually triggered, or what a replacement would look like 
(define_insn_and_split post-reload? unspec? completely something else?).
Got hints?

Gr.
Steven

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [rs6000] Don't emit libcall notes around TLS address
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- [rs6000] Don't emit libcall notes around TLS address
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [rs6000] Don't emit libcall notes around TLS address
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [rs6000] Don't emit libcall notes around TLS address
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]