This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Deal with local static same way as we deal with global static for IPA

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, jason at redhat dot com, zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 12:44:12 -0700
Subject: Re: Deal with local static same way as we deal with global static for IPA
References: <20050607201159.GW11634@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20050608011126.GA24061@redhat.com> <20050608090251.GC11634@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20050608190357.GB11150@redhat.com> <20050608193917.GF11634@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 09:39:17PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> OK, so you suggest instead of remapping it, simply go ahead and drop it
> into the unexpanded_var_list (so we will have generic functions with
> this list partly initialized before we gimplify)?

Yes.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Deal with local static same way as we deal with global static for IPA
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- Deal with local static same way as we deal with global static for IPA
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Deal with local static same way as we deal with global static for IPA
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Deal with local static same way as we deal with global static for IPA
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Deal with local static same way as we deal with global static for IPA
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Deal with local static same way as we deal with global static for IPA
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]