This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Failures in tests for obj-c++....
Well, unfortunately the patches you committed thus far did not solve
the problems on Fedora Core 3. :-(...
On 8 Jun 2005, at 0.15, David Ayers wrote:
Ziemowit Laski wrote:
On 7 Jun 2005, at 14.19, David Ayers wrote:
Also we should be weary of relying on:
#include "objc/runtime.h" /* the kitchen sink */
which will in turn:
Ah, good catch! Is there any reason that the latter cannot be turned
Actually, I believe that would be correct.
Would such a patch be pre-approved?
Actually, I'll try replacing _all_ occurrences of
in the objc headers (via '%s/<objc\/\(.*\)>/"\1"/g' vim command), and
to see if that helps, so why don't you hold off for now. Thanks.
PS-OT: This reminds me, I always found the following comment in the
autoconf info pages confusing:
"Use `#include <config.h>' instead
of `#include "config.h"', and pass the C compiler a `-I.' option (or
`-I..'; whichever directory contains `config.h'). That way, even if
the source directory is configured itself (perhaps to make a
distribution), other build directories can also be configured without
finding the `config.h' from the source directory."
the -I directives are not limited to system includes. I see no gain in
searching for config.h as a system header.
Am I missing something or is there value in bringing this up on the
I really don't know much about the innards of the auto* tools, so
someone more knowledgable can chime in, and/or you can ask the auto*
directly like you suggest.
Ziemowit Laski 1 Infinite Loop, MS 301-2K
Mac OS X Compiler Group Cupertino, CA USA 95014-2083
Apple Computer, Inc. +1.408.974.6229 Fax .5477