This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix 21903
Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Why not using an additional new field in tree_default_arg instead (e.g. a
VEC of trees)? If we ever want to get rid of TREE_CHAIN, we should stop
adding new overloaded uses.
you're right. I should have just put that version on the 4.0 branch.
<thinks>must get out of habit of finding unused fields</thinks>
Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
email@example.com :: http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk