This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix 21903


Giovanni Bajo wrote:

Why not using an additional new field in tree_default_arg instead (e.g. a
VEC of trees)? If we ever want to get rid of TREE_CHAIN, we should stop
adding new overloaded uses.

you're right. I should have just put that version on the 4.0 branch.


<thinks>must get out of habit of finding unused fields</thinks>

nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::     CodeSourcery LLC
nathan@codesourcery.com    ::     http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]