This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [gfortran testsuite, committed] Re: gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90


On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 08:00:41PM +0200, Tobias Schl?ter wrote:
> Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >>Does this cure the problem?
> > 
> > 
> > No, it does not for me,
> 
> I tried the testcase with ifc (Intel(R) Fortran Compiler for 32-bit
> applications, Version 8.1    Build 20040803) and with Sun's f95 (f90: Sun
> Fortran 95 8.0 Patch 115984-02 2004/11/03) both with and without optimization,
> and it didn't fail.  I've reviewed the testcase, and I'm sure that it
> shouldn't abort and doesn't invoke undefined behavior any longer.
> 
> Thus I believe the testcase exposes a pre-existing bug in gfortran.  What
> should we do?  XFAIL the testcase and open a PR?
> 

Yes, XFAIL the testcase and open a PR.  NAG's compiler also compiles
the program and it executes without a problem.

-- 
Steve


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]