This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [gfortran testsuite, committed] Re: gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90


Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>Does this cure the problem?
> 
> 
> No, it does not for me,

I tried the testcase with ifc (Intel(R) Fortran Compiler for 32-bit
applications, Version 8.1    Build 20040803) and with Sun's f95 (f90: Sun
Fortran 95 8.0 Patch 115984-02 2004/11/03) both with and without optimization,
and it didn't fail.  I've reviewed the testcase, and I'm sure that it
shouldn't abort and doesn't invoke undefined behavior any longer.

Thus I believe the testcase exposes a pre-existing bug in gfortran.  What
should we do?  XFAIL the testcase and open a PR?

- Tobi


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]