This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] MIPS32 DSP intrinsics
Mark Mitchell <email@example.com> writes:
> Presumably, there will be such hardware soonish, and then users and
> distributors who have GCC 4.1 will be all set. If we wait to include
> the bits until after there's more public information, then we won't have
> support until some later point, and users who go out and buy the
> hardware when it's released will lose. I think it's reasonable for a
> company to want to have released versions of GCC support their hardware
> on the day that the hardware is first released. And I think that's a
> great thing for GCC; other compilers may not be as far along!
> Of course, there may be lots of other reasons not to accept the code! I
> just don't think lack of simulators and/or docs should be one. I think
> it's in our long-term interest to encourage hardware vendors to invest
> in GCC and if we require simulators/docs/hardware up front that will
> discourage them, or encourage them to develop on private branches.
> Either way, our FSF userbase loses.
Well, I think we've got to the point where we'll just keep restating
our positions without getting anywhere. I disagree with what you say,
but at the end of the day, you're a GWP maintainer and Eric and I aren't.
If it's decided that we should accept the patch once it's technically
sound, so be it.