This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Problems with PR 21210
- From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- To: "Nathan (Jasper) Myers" <ncm at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net, jason at redhat dot com, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, nathan at codesourcery dot com
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 21:11:36 -0700
- Subject: Re: Problems with PR 21210
- References: <200505292006.j4TK6ktK008048@sethra.codesourcery.com><xyphdgkpc53.fsf@miranda.boston.redhat.com><429B9AAF.30509@codesourcery.com><m34qckfc3j.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><429BBDDE.10301@codesourcery.com><20050531170242.6a3d8f55.bkoz@redhat.com><429CE32D.3060801@codesourcery.com><20050601023843.GC8966@codesourcery.com><429D26F1.30609@codesourcery.com><20050601034004.GD8966@codesourcery.com>
> This also depends on somebody not myself doing a not-insubstantial
> amount of core compiler work to make it happen; and somebody else
> jimmying the libstdc++ headers to match, presumably a lesser task.
I gotta wonder how much of the way there it would get us if we could
write
template <typename T> class complex;
template <>
typedef _Complex double complex<double>;
(yes, that's a typedef partially specializing a class template.)
zw