This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] tree-ssa-ccp.c: Propagate even more ADDR_EXPRs.


On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 08:43:58AM -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote:

> I'm not sure if we want to bother with this in CCP.  The forward 
> propagation code already handles this case rather effectively.  What's
> the real benefit from doing the same optimization in CCP that we're
> already doing in forwprop.c?
> 
The propagation done by CCP is inherently more powerful, but this
case may be so rare in practice that I wouldn't be surprised if
it didn't any difference either way.

> [ Now you could argue that all the ADDR_EXPR stuff in forwprop.c could
>   be moved into CCP.  They're not really constants or invariants, but
>   with some work we could probably convince CCP to handle them.  ]
> 
Either that, or re-implement forwprop using the propagation
engine.


Diego.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]