This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] tree-ssa-ccp.c: Propagate ADDR_EXPRs further.

From: Jeffrey A Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Kazu Hirata <kazu at cs dot umass dot edu>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 23:02:14 -0600
Subject: Re: [patch] tree-ssa-ccp.c: Propagate ADDR_EXPRs further.
References: <20050527.001713.98419647.kazu@cs.umass.edu> <1117168839.12471.283.camel@localhost.localdomain> <a0dacc011086f4b90d6797301d09ef9f@physics.uc.edu>
Reply-to: law at redhat dot com

On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 00:44 -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On May 27, 2005, at 12:40 AM, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> > I'd like to see at least some measurement of compile-time impacts.
> 
> How can this have a compile time impact if fold_binary_to_constant
> just calls fold_binary anyways (likewise for fold_unary_to_constant)?
Well, that would be a relatively recent change.  If that's all it 
does now, then why do we have it as a separate routine at all?
jeff

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] tree-ssa-ccp.c: Propagate ADDR_EXPRs further.
  - From: Kazu Hirata

References:
- [patch] tree-ssa-ccp.c: Propagate ADDR_EXPRs further.
  - From: Kazu Hirata
- Re: [patch] tree-ssa-ccp.c: Propagate ADDR_EXPRs further.
  - From: Jeffrey A Law
- Re: [patch] tree-ssa-ccp.c: Propagate ADDR_EXPRs further.
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]