This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PR java/19870: Generate Synthetic Accessors For Static Private Field Accesses Across Nested Classes
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>
- Cc: GCJ Patches <java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 26 May 2005 12:21:59 -0600
- Subject: Re: PR java/19870: Generate Synthetic Accessors For Static Private Field Accesses Across Nested Classes
- References: <42957A5C.firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Ranjit" == Ranjit Mathew <email@example.com> writes:
Ranjit> Here is a patch for PR java/19870. This patch generalises
Ranjit> the current synthetic accessor generation support in GCJ for
Ranjit> private fields in outer classes accessed from nested classes
Ranjit> to additionally support:
I think we also need similar treatment for private methods.
Or is this working ok?
Ranjit> Tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu with Jacks included. The Jacks
Ranjit> testresults were rather disappointing:
Ranjit> FAIL: 8.5.2-accessible-static-member-usage-3
Ranjit> FAIL: 15.8.4-static-2
I wouldn't expect to see much improvement on jacks simply because we
accepted this code fine, and then generated invalid bytecode. Most of
the jacks tests are purely for semantic analysis and don't try
executing the result.