This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix 14844/15459/21608: Forward-propagate casts that will collapse

On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 03:43:23PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 06:35:33PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > Not by hacking into copy-prop, I hope.
> Why not?  It *is* a copy, bitwise if not typewise.  Because of
> that, heuristics wrt cse-ing of other expressions don't really
> apply the same way.
Mostly because it would only catch that specific case, whereas ...

> At least using the same engine if you don't like sullying the
> existing pass.
... in this case, we would just get it as one of the various
expression combination that a generic expression propagator might

But you do have a point in that type casts are bitwise copies,
after all.  What if you simply modify copy_prop_visit_stmt
to strip type casts before checking the RHS for copies?

T1 x_3 = (T1)y_1;
T2 z_5 = (T2)x_3;

If we strip T1, x_3's value becomes y_1 which is then substituted
in the second statement.  Final substitution can determine that
the cast is not needed in z_5 = (T2)y_1.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]