This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Call for middle-end reviewer] Oustanding visibility PR 20218
- From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
- To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 22:32:55 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Call for middle-end reviewer] Oustanding visibility PR 20218
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0505231413170.5661-100000@www.eyesopen.com>
Roger Sayle wrote:
>On Mon, 23 May 2005, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>
>
>>Only a quick comment, however, not of technical nature, a clarification:
>>actually my remark above was partially *wrong*, in this sense: I
>>confused submitter of 20218 (HJ himself) with submitter of 19664 (Pawel
>>Sikora, "pluto"): the latter indeed reported to have tested the entire
>>set (19664 + 20218) on other arches beyond those three: I see now that
>>probably he didn't run the entire testsuite. Sorry about the confusion.
>>
>>
>Ahh! Thanks for the clarification. I thought it a bit odd when you
>referred to the bug submitter, when for 20218 that was the same person
>as the patch author.
>
>Looking through PR19664, it looks like Andreas has indeed additionally
>tested on powerpc, alpha and sparc. By great luck/misfortune, these
>additional platforms are all unaffected by the bug in HJ's patch, so
>even full bootstraps and regression tests won't expose the regressions.
>
>
I see, ok (actually tests have been carried out both by Andreas himself
and Pawel ;)
Paolo.