Re: PATCH: PR middle-end/20303: Can't push more than 16 nested visibility

["H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>]

On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 02:35:46PM +0100, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> H. J. Lu wrote:
> 
> >FWIW, it is a regression from 4.0. It is OK to use DEF_VEC_MALLOC_O
> >since it is different from DEF_VEC_GC_O which gengtype won't touch.
> >Now we only have DEF_VEC_O for everyone.
> >
> >Let me know what you want me to use. I can use DEF_VEC_P if it works.
> 
> I suggest DEF_VEC_MALLOC_P for 4.0 and DEF_VEC_ALLOC_P(,heap) for 4.1.
> Look at global.c for an example use with 'int'.

I am enclosing a patch for 4.0 and a patch for 4.1. For 4.1, I have
to use

DEF_VEC_P (int);
DEF_VEC_ALLOC_P (int, heap);

in 4.1 instead of

typedef enum symbol_visibility visibility;
DEF_VEC_P (visibility);
DEF_VEC_ALLOC_P (visibility, heap);

like we can in 4.0 with

typedef enum symbol_visibility visibility;
DEF_VEC_MALLOC_P (visibility);

It seems like a regression to me because we no loner use non-struct
directly.


H.J.

Attachment: gcc-4.0-vsb-stack-3.patch
Description: Text document

Attachment: gcc-vsb-stack-6.patch
Description: Text document