This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] PR21332

From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Kazu Hirata <kazu at cs dot umass dot edu>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 01:56:27 +0200
Subject: Re: [RFC] PR21332
References: <200505180116.06899.stevenb@suse.de> <20050517235329.GA9597@topo.toronto.redhat.com>

On Wednesday 18 May 2005 01:53, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:16:06AM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > Does this look like a good approach for now, or should we just
> > move to a symbolic -INF and +INF representation ASAP?
>
> I'd rather wait.  Symbolic ranges are among the changes I have
> queued up for VRP.  The patch I'm working on should address
> several of the open VRP PRs.

When are you going to empty this queue?  They are not just open
PRs, but open wrong code regressions.  This one actually bit me ;-)

Gr.
Steven

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] PR21332
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- [RFC] PR21332
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [RFC] PR21332
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]