This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: PR 18655
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 09:33:46PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> >It's probably going to require a gruesome unwinding hack anyway.
> Can you treat a return address of 0x41 in the CFA as meaning 0x6c on
> PowerPC? Or notice the mismatch somehow? (I'm curious, in other words,
> as to whether you drop the non-DWARF2 unwinding by default, and
> compensate for the sometimes-broken DWARF2.)
More likely we will treat the two as the same column; 65 is assigned to
the fpscr, right, or something similar? GCC currently never generates
it and GDB never decodes it because it's not a useful place to store