This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Eliminate warnings about snprintf declaration


On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 10:40:59PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 13:04:35 -0400
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
> > 	gdb-patches@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org
> > 
> > > > bfd/ChangeLog:
> > > > 2005-05-14  Eli Zaretskii  <eliz@gnu.org>
> > > > 
> > > > 	* configure.in: Add snprintf and vsnprintf to AC_CHECK_DECLS.
> > > 
> > > These patches are approved, plus the change to libiberty/configure.ac
> > > which needs the obvious ChangeLog entry.  Thanks.
> > 
> > Eli, please mention regenerating configure in the ChangeLog.
> 
> I didn't send patches for the (regenerated) configure and config.in.
> Should I do that, given that I cannot commit them anyway?

No, you don't need to.  If you mention them in the ChangeLog, that'll
serve as a hint to whoever commits the patch which files need to be
regenerated.

> > Same comment as above applies; please mention configure.
> 
> (And config.in, right?)  Will do.

Good catch.  Yes, thank you.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]