This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Steven Bosscher <stevenb@suse.de> writes: > On Sunday 15 May 2005 14:12, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> Ok to commit? I propose to commit to 4.0 as well without the >> -Wstrict-prototypes addition. Ok? > > Why disable this for 4.0? If we add it, we should add my patches to fix the prototypes. I just want to use "-Wall" for 4.0. But if all patches from mainline are moved over to 4.0 at one point, then that's fine with me as well. The problem is that if I enable -Wstrict-prototypes, we need the other patches as well... > >> * Makefile.am: Remove AM_CFLAGS here. >> * configure.ac: Define AM_CFLAGS and AM_FCFLAGS so that warnings >> are set. Set additionally -Wstrict-prototypes for CFLAGS. >> * Makefile.in: Regenerated >> * configure: Regenerated. > > If it works, I'm happy with it. > > The more warnings, the better -- or something like that... ;-) Down to zero - have to think about enabling some more ;-) - and then add -Werror, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |