This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC: MIPS clones without lwl/lwr/swl/swr
- From: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at redhat dot com>
- To: Marek Michalkiewicz <marekm at amelek dot gda dot pl>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 08:39:43 +0100
- Subject: Re: RFC: MIPS clones without lwl/lwr/swl/swr
- References: <20050513145612.GA17580@amelek.gda.pl>
Marek Michalkiewicz <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> The patch below (for mainline) is an attempt to support MIPS clones
> which don't have the patented lwl/lwr/swl/swr instructions. This
> would be useful mainly for the Realtek RTL8181 "Wireless LAN Access
> Point / Gateway Controller", based on the Lexra core. Linux/uClibc
> port for the RTL8181 is available at http://rtl8181.sourceforge.net/ .
> This is not tested (other than it compiles), so not meant for
> inclusion in the official GCC source just yet - but I kindly ask
> you (especially MIPS hackers, because I'm not yet very familiar
> with this architecture) to review it and tell me if it looks good.
Looks good to me.
The MIPS port usually guards this sort of instruction selection with an
ISA_HAS_* macro (ISA_HAS_COND_TRAP, ISA_HAS_CLZ_CLO, etc.). One thing
I'd like to see is a new ISA_HAS_* macro to say whether lwl/lwr,
etc. are available. The macro would be false if your new option is
passed and would also be false for TARGET_MIPS16. If at some point
in the future, -march is extended to support a processor without the
patented instructions, the macro would be false when generating code
for that processor.
> Suggestions for a better name for this option are also welcome.
I've no strong opinions about that, but I don't see any need to
shorten "patent-free" to "patfree".