This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix fold_indirect_ref
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 15:10 -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On May 12, 2005, at 2:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 05:40:32PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >> 2005-04-28 Richard Guenther <email@example.com>
> >> * fold-const.c (fold_indirect_ref_1): Avoid removing
> >> NOP_EXPRs with type qualifiers like const.
> > This patch causes a regression on gcc-4_0-branch in g++.dg/opt/temp1.C,
> > which is now miscompiled on at least i386/x86_64/ppc/ppc64/ia64.
> > Can you please look into it or revert?
> God I how I hate GCC's type system.
Something doesn't make any sense here -- Richard's change merely reduces
the number of NOP_EXPRs that are stripped. If it's causing a regression
then it must be exposing some kind of latent bug elsewhere.