This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix fold_indirect_ref

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 15:10:53 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix fold_indirect_ref
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0505101735140.5176-100000@alwazn.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> <20050512184237.GY17420@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

On May 12, 2005, at 2:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 05:40:32PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:

2005-04-28 Richard Guenther <rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>
	* fold-const.c (fold_indirect_ref_1): Avoid removing
	NOP_EXPRs with type qualifiers like const.


This patch causes a regression on gcc-4_0-branch in g++.dg/opt/temp1.C,
which is now miscompiled on at least i386/x86_64/ppc/ppc64/ia64.
Can you please look into it or revert?

God I how I hate GCC's type system.

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix fold_indirect_ref
  - From: Jeffrey A Law

References:
- [PATCH] Fix fold_indirect_ref
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] Fix fold_indirect_ref
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]