This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFA] Eliminate warnings about snprintf declaration
"Eli Zaretskii" <email@example.com> writes:
> > I believe you've got this logic reversed. You also don't want or need
> > the non-prototype - it's only needed for basename because basename
> > returns a pointer. How about this, based on the later examples in the
> > file:
> Okay. But I guess I should wait for approval by libiberty maintainers
I think Dan's comments are correct in that the patch needs to be
fixed. I, for one, would rather approve the final version of the
The general idea is fine.