This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, committed] POWER5 popcntb, xl-compat, and options fixes.

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 20:43:53 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH, committed] POWER5 popcntb, xl-compat, and options fixes.
References: <200505071900.j47J0C030908@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20050508015114.GC4294@redhat.com> <200505080217.j482Hb028714@makai.watson.ibm.com>

On Sat, May 07, 2005 at 10:17:37PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> 	What do you recommend?
> 
> (((HOST_WIDE_INT) 0x01010101 << 32) | 0x01010101)

Do you actually need the suffix at all?  I thought gcc would warn
for decimal, but not hex constants.  But failing that, yes.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH, committed] POWER5 popcntb, xl-compat, and options fixes.
  - From: Andrew Pinski

References:
- [PATCH, committed] POWER5 popcntb, xl-compat, and options fixes.
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [PATCH, committed] POWER5 popcntb, xl-compat, and options fixes.
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH, committed] POWER5 popcntb, xl-compat, and options fixes.
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]