This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: assertify mn10300
Alexandre Oliva <email@example.com> writes:
> On May 7, 2005, Zack Weinberg <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> and a compromise was reached (--enable-checking=release doesn't
>> disable gcc_assert, you have to build specifically with
> I see. I was misled by a recent patch I posted, in which Roger Sayle
> recommended me not to use gcc_assert in a certain case because it
> would remove the desired side effects should checking be disabled. I
> didn't realize releases no longer had all forms of checking disabled.
I don't recall exactly what Roger said, but I think he was commenting
on a case where the side-effect should always be executed, even when
the data structure is correct.
> That was not my intention. Sorry if it sounded like that.