This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] tree-ssa-operands.c: Use VEC instead of VARRAY.

From: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
To: Kazu Hirata <kazu at cs dot umass dot edu>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 12:21:18 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch] tree-ssa-operands.c: Use VEC instead of VARRAY.
References: <20050504.134026.27079519.kazu@cs.umass.edu> <1115229521.6516.232.camel@pain> <20050505.115720.90803970.kazu@cs.umass.edu>

On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 11:57, Kazu Hirata wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> > They are not work vectors. They are a cache for the potentially long
> > strings of virtual operands that are added at call sites. They can last
> > for the duration of the operand cache, so they could be xmalloc'd.
> 
> OK.  Do the contents of these arrays have to be visible from GC?  Or
> if they are cache, I guess somebody else should be pointing to
> operands that the arrays also point to, so we don't need GTY?
> 
no, they don't need to be visible from GC.

Andrew

References:
- [patch] tree-ssa-operands.c: Use VEC instead of VARRAY.
  - From: Kazu Hirata
- Re: [patch] tree-ssa-operands.c: Use VEC instead of VARRAY.
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- Re: [patch] tree-ssa-operands.c: Use VEC instead of VARRAY.
  - From: Kazu Hirata

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]