This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] config.gcc: Obsolete c4x.

On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 17:12 -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Kazu Hirata wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Attached is a patch to obsolete c4x for both 4.0 and 4.1.
> > 
> > When we discuessed this issue a while ago, there was no interest in
> > c4x port for code generation purposes.  There were some other
> > interests like using this port to ensure that we are not tied to
> > QImode == 8 bits.

This matches with my memory, but ... 

1. I don't recall any consensus on abandoning QImode!=8bits.

AFAIK, the c4x is the only platform w/ QImode !=8bit in GCC, which
causes your patch to abandoning the only testing platform for such

Are you wanting to abandon QImode != 8bit? This, IMO would qualify as a
serious design defect in GCC (Admitted, we all know GCC has problems
related to this, but abandoning it and means loss of generality)

2. tic4x-gcc-3.4.x is buildable, tic4x-gcc-4.x had never built.

i.e. actually a regression has occurred sometime between 3.4.x and 4.0,
which had slipped through GCC-regression testing cracks.

> > Tested on i686-pc-linux-gnu.  OK to apply?
IMHO: No, you are going too far.

> OK.

.. As well I consider Mark to be going too far in "nodding off" this
patch ..


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]