This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] What? Another operand patch?

From: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
To: Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 10:30:30 -0400
Subject: Re: [patch] What? Another operand patch?
References: <1114800916.10172.5049.camel@pain> <001d01c54d25$14e46bd0$e74e2a97@bagio>

On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 21:36, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Anyway, attached is a patch which applies to mainline as of this
> > morning.
> 
> I see at least one call to abort() in the code. We are trying to move away from
> abort() and use gcc_assert()/gcc_unreachable() instead. Could you audit your
> patch for this? Thanks.

Oops, how'd that get in there?   Yeah, its the only one, it should have
been gcc_unreachable().

thanks
Andrew

References:
- [patch] What? Another operand patch?
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- Re: [patch] What? Another operand patch?
  - From: Giovanni Bajo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]