This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] tree-ssa-dom.c: Use VEC(vrp_element_p,heap) instead ofVARRAY.

From: Kazu Hirata <kazu at cs dot umass dot edu>
To: law at redhat dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, nathan at codesourcery dot com
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 12:19:51 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [patch] tree-ssa-dom.c: Use VEC(vrp_element_p,heap) instead ofVARRAY.
References: <20050427.093812.78159407.kazu@cs.umass.edu><1114609621.370.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Hi Jeff,

> Actually, now that we have a real VRP pass, we should *seriously*
> consider killing the VRP code in tree-ssa-dom.c.

Yes.

> I haven't looked, but I would utterly amazed if the simplistic stuff
> done by tree-ssa-dom.c isn't totally subsumed by the new VRP pass.

Well, we can probably feed DOM similar information using
SSA_NAME_VALUE_RANGE.

Kazu Hirata

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] tree-ssa-dom.c: Use VEC(vrp_element_p,heap) instead ofVARRAY.
  - From: Jeffrey A Law
- Re: [patch] tree-ssa-dom.c: Use VEC(vrp_element_p,heap) instead of VARRAY.
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- [patch] tree-ssa-dom.c: Use VEC(vrp_element_p,heap) instead ofVARRAY.
  - From: Kazu Hirata
- Re: [patch] tree-ssa-dom.c: Use VEC(vrp_element_p,heap) instead ofVARRAY.
  - From: Jeffrey A Law

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]