This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
I suspect the reason ENTRY and EXIT are negative was probably laziness to avoid going through the code and finding which of the places that loop from index 0 to n_basic_blocks would break if ENTRY and EXIT were included. As well as many historical places which probably assumed block 0 was the entry block.
Yup. It took a *lot* of auditing to find all these places. :)
for (i = NUM_FIXED_BLOCKS; i < n_basic_blocks; i++)
(I have to think about the latter for a few extra milliseconds... and we all know how much I hate to think :-)
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |