This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [wwwdocs] Don't require touching cvs.html for releases (was: PATCH: Bump version on mainline)
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>,"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>,Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 18:54:02 -0400
- Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] Don't require touching cvs.html for releases (was: PATCH: Bump version on mainline)
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0502252239470.13707@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <87vf8esh2o.fsf@codesourcery.com> <4222B5BA.3050506@codesourcery.com> <87sm3hp4ci.fsf@codesourcery.com> <422341F7.6070705@codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0502281738190.25570@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <42235ABA.6090602@codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0502281813590.25570@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <422366D4.3010201@codesourcery.com> <Pine.BSF.4.62.0504202333020.65626@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 11:38:04PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> +<p>The CVS tag for GCC release <i>X</i>.<i>Y</i>.<i>Z</i> is generally of
> +the form "gcc_<i>X</i>_<i>Y</i>_<i>Z</i>"; the following list therefore
> +provides only some representative examples.</p>
> +
Hmm, that's not right. It's "gcc_<i>X</i>_<i>Y</i>_<i>Z</i>_release".
Could you mention these tags also:
> - <li>gcc-4_0-branch</li>
The CVS branch for GCC releases in the <i>X</i>.<i>Y</i>.x series is
generally of the form "gcc-<i>X</i>_<i>Y</i>-branch".
Also, some of the old releases omit the _0, omit the _release, or use
miscellaneous hyphens. From your list I saw these that just don't fit:
> - <li>gcc_3_3_release</li>
> - <li>gcc_3_2_release</li>
> - <li>gcc_3_1_release</li>
> - <li>gcc_3_0_release</li>
> - <li>gcc-2_95_3</li>
> - <li>gcc-2_95_2-release</li>
> - <li>gcc-2_95_1-release</li>
> - <li>gcc-2_95-release</li>
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC