This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] fix 20375 (again)
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 13:50:31 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix 20375 (again)
- References: <42612645.3020904@codesourcery.com>
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 03:50:45PM +0100, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> If someone could verify this doesn't cause any alpha regressions, that
> would be peachy :)
Actually, don't. I've since determined that it's a bug in the alpha
backend. I'm testing a fix, but my nice fast alpha seems to have died,
so this is taking a while.
> BTW, there's scope for cleanup on the target call setup_incoming_varargs ---
> it is always called with the NO_RTL parameter false.
More than that. See the end of
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/general%20backend%20cleanup
r~