This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
----Original Message---- >From: Zack Weinberg >Sent: 12 April 2005 18:31 > "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com> writes: > >> Then the error message *really* ought to say >> >> gcc: -E or -x required when input is from standard input >> >> since it is thoroughly obtuse and non-explanatory as it stands. The >> attached is against 4.0 RC1, but I imagine it'll apply cleanly to HEAD >> with just a little fuzz, if people feel it's the right thing. > > Yes, I think this is the right thing. Please test against mainline > and apply it there if successful. I don't think it is important > enough to put into 4.0.0, but you should put it on the 4.0 branch > after the release, and maybe the 3.4 branch as well. > > zw Tested on HEAD with --enable-languages=c,c++ by running "make check-gcc check-libstdc++ check-gcc-c++" (yes I know there's some redundant redundancy in that list of targets) and then diff'ing the before-and-after outputs from test_summary to make sure nothing changed (as well as eyeballing the summary figures); nothing did. Final patch attached (it hasn't changed any). It's a trivial patch, but I have an assign on file and in fact my employer disclaimer is in the post as we speak. (Finally got it signed just the other day, hooray!) No write privs; Zack, would you be so kind? TIA! 2005-12-04 Dave Korn <dave.korn@artimi.com> * gcc.c (default_compilers): Clarify obscure error message when reading from standard input. cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
Attachment:
obscure-error-message-patch.diff
Description: Binary data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |