This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patches for coldfire v4e

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Bernardo Innocenti <bernie at develer dot com>
Cc: arcjai at yahoo dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,peter at the-baradas dot com, Jaiprakash C <cjaiprakash at noida dot hcltech dot com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:05:12 -0400
Subject: Re: Patches for coldfire v4e
References: <20050413074406.24047.qmail@web54304.mail.yahoo.com> <425CD3FF.8080907@develer.com> <20050413160658.GA27981@nevyn.them.org> <425E1D9B.6020707@develer.com>

On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 09:36:59AM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:10:39AM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> >>
> >>So it seems adding coldfire-linux is the only way
> >>to address this...
> > 
> > Why?  Adding support (if it isn't already there) for something like
> > --with-arch=coldfire should work just as well.
> 
> But how do we change behavior in gcc/config/t-linux
> according to the switch?

You probably don't need to.  The newly built compiler will default to
the right architecture; any assembly routines can be keyed off an
appropriate builtin define.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC

References:
- Re: Patches for coldfire v4e
  - From: arcjai
- Re: Patches for coldfire v4e
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti
- Re: Patches for coldfire v4e
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Patches for coldfire v4e
  - From: Bernardo Innocenti

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]