This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Support ENTRY in FUNCTIONs (PR fortran/13082)
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: Tobias Schl?ter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:52:14 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support ENTRY in FUNCTIONs (PR fortran/13082)
- References: <20050408150828.GT17420@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <425AC376.6010700@physik.uni-muenchen.de>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 08:35:34PM +0200, Tobias Schl?ter wrote:
>
> The third bug is a showstopper. While entries within modules are not as
> important (the usual application of entries seems to be getting module-like
> encapsulation, so there's no point of using them inside modules), we should
> definitely should get them right outside of modules.
>
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you here, but entries inside a
module would be important from the standpoint of wrapping
old Fortran 77 code to get explicit interfaces.
--
Steve