This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph


On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 05:56:55PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> I don't really know how to prove the theory that we can lose the 
> functionality.  I can see how we can disprove the theory: someone can 
> present an example (as you did), for which we develop the consensus 
> "yes, that's a reasonable thing for a user to do, so we must support 
> this."  I suppose we could hardwire -funit-at-a-time to on for a while 
> (as it happens to break the ordering), and see how many people yell at 
> us, and then, if there was no persuasive yelling, consider that we've 
> proved the theory.

It's on by default; it has been for a long time.  People explicitly
turn it off, i.e. there are users of the -fno-unit-at-a-time option.
I think that qualifies as proof by yelling.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]