This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC: default insn length should be 1 but that breaks m68hc11 and regresses mn10300.
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com>
- To: drow at false dot org
- Cc: hans-peter dot nilsson at axis dot com, stcarrez at nerim dot fr, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:30:28 +0200
- Subject: Re: RFC: default insn length should be 1 but that breaks m68hc11 and regresses mn10300.
> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:20:03 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 05:12:28PM +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > > Concerning these bad validation results:
> > > - There are several fixes in the reload pass which are necessary.
> > > - Several tests must be fixed as they are not valid on a 16-bit target
> > > (http://m68hc11.serveftp.org/m68hc11_src.php).
> >
> > What about the nonexistent sim-valid.x script?
>
> See the install-scripts rule in libgloss/m68hc11/.
I did, of course. I don't see the transformation of ".ld" to
".x" there, just the equivalent of
s/sim-valid-m68hc1?.ld/sim-valid.ld/. And even if it was
correct, it'd mean that you must test against an *installed*
libgloss.
Better make sure the sim-valid.x name is available, maybe
achieveable by building it by that name in libgloss.
brgds, H-P