This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] Speed up # of iterations analysis


> yes, was just agreeing/observing since doing so and applying the result as
> in #3 above, isn't likely as preferable as alternative optimizations which
> don't rely on determining the number of iterations of a loop;

Do you have any data to back this up?

There are plenty of very powerful loop transformations that require
knowing the number of iterations of a loop.

Claiming that "alternative optimizations" will work just as well seems a
bit far fetched.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]