This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [libstdc++ patch] Fix ambiguity in calls to bind

From: Douglas Gregor <doug dot gregor at gmail dot com>
To: libstdc++ <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,Joseph S. Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 22:11:49 -0500
Subject: Re: [libstdc++ patch] Fix ambiguity in calls to bind
References: <200504011026.51429.doug.gregor@gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504011643370.5441@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <5817361aafc21004ea8535bcb4a5c597@cs.indiana.edu>

On Apr 1, 2005, at 2:23 PM, Doug Gregor wrote:

On Apr 1, 2005, at 11:44 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Douglas Gregor wrote:

A recent change to mainline GCC exposed an ambiguity in function template partial ordering for tr1::bind. The compiler is right, so here's the "obvious" fix.

Tested i686-pc-linux-gnu on mainline; no regressions. Okay for mainline? This will also be needed on the 4.0 branch. Assuming all tests pass there, okay for 4.0 branch?
Is this the fix for the
FAIL: tr1/3_function_objects/bind/ref.cc (test for excess errors)
which appeared with today's mainline?

Patch committed on mainline and 4.0 branch. This should clear up that regression.

Doug

References:
- [libstdc++ patch] Fix ambiguity in calls to bind
  - From: Douglas Gregor
- Re: [libstdc++ patch] Fix ambiguity in calls to bind
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [libstdc++ patch] Fix ambiguity in calls to bind
  - From: Doug Gregor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]