This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PR tree-optimization/19903
- From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- To: paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 05 12:31:52 EST
- Subject: Re: PR tree-optimization/19903
So I did not Remember Correctly :-) Maybe it is the usage of
TYPE_PRECISION for C bitfields that is recent...
Correct.
The problem with many Ada bugs is that the tree optimizers have
stricter semantics than the expander, and it is not clear where it is
that the semantics have changed. This thread is showing that.
Indeed, but how can it be *incorrect* to say that a type has *larger*
precision than it does? I could understand if it were *smaller*.