This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gfortran] patch PR 20660

From: FranÃois-Xavier Coudert <Francois-Xavier dot Coudert at lcp dot u-psud dot fr>
To: Walt Brainerd <walt at fortran dot com>
Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:08:03 +0200
Subject: Re: [gfortran] patch PR 20660
Organization: Laboratoire de Chimie Physique
References: <42493094.3090203@lcp.u-psud.fr> <42497AA3.3020602@fortran.com>

A unit number must be nonnegative, so it would be better
to return false for a negative number.

I thought this was already taken care of at this point of the code, but it isn't. Updated patch will come.

In trying this, I found a couple of other oddities that I will send.
They would be pretty far down the list of things to fix, I would think.

Yes, but as not all of us have the same ability to fix bugs, you will probably find people like me that can fix precise, I/O related bugs while not being able to mess with the guts of the compiler itself. When you have time, I'll be happy to have a look at that.

FX

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [gfortran] patch PR 20660
  - From: Walt Brainerd

References:
- [gfortran] patch PR 20660
  - From: FranÃois-Xavier Coudert
- Re: [gfortran] patch PR 20660
  - From: Walt Brainerd

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]