This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes: > I know get tons of warnings in libiberty like the following: > /cvs/gcc/libiberty/cp-demangle.c:2609: warning: traditional C rejects ISO C styl > e function definitions > > I propose to remove the "-Wtraditional -pedantic" flags from the > CFLAGS, they are currently set in configure.ac: > > ac_libiberty_warn_cflags='-W -Wall -Wtraditional -pedantic' > > Here's a patch. I'm currently testing on x86-64-linux-gnu. Ok to > commit if bootstrap passes? I just noticed that we use in the gcc subdir itself -pedantic. Is this patch ok with just the removal of -Wtraditional? We could even add some more warn flags but that's some others should look into, Andreas > Andreas > > 2005-03-27 Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> > > * configure.ac (ac_c_preproc_warn_flag): Remove -Wtraditional > -pedantic flags. > * configure: Regenerated. > > ============================================================ > Index: libiberty/configure.ac > --- libiberty/configure.ac 25 Mar 2005 04:41:38 -0000 1.16 > +++ libiberty/configure.ac 27 Mar 2005 10:17:30 -0000 > @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ AC_PROG_CC > AC_PROG_CPP_WERROR > > if test x$GCC = xyes; then > - ac_libiberty_warn_cflags='-W -Wall -Wtraditional -pedantic' > + ac_libiberty_warn_cflags='-W -Wall' > fi > AC_SUBST(ac_libiberty_warn_cflags) Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |