This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Run V3 tests on installed compiler


On Mar 23, 2005, at 10:36 AM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
[...]
| Your plan would work too, but rather than having DejaGNU look for the
| file, I think it would be technically better to have the user use the
| normal DejaGNU mechanisms for selecting which tests to run. Perhaps,
| we could put the logic you're looking for into the Makefile, so that
| "make check-maintainer" automatically passed in testsuite_files, if
| typing the runtest command manually is noxious. I don't feel very
| strongly about this; if you think its vital that DejaGNU look for the
| file, I'll make that change ASAP.
That would be an improvement.

What, in particular, would be an improvement? Adding "check- maintainer" (or "maintainer-check"?)? Or, changing normal.exp to read testsuite_files if it exists? What is it you would like me to do?

I have a preference for reading testsuite_files, if it exists. Also, I don't think it is unreasonable for the testsuite to build by default the objects it needs during the build, and then just using them if they like that workflow. The difference can be put into the site.exp file, such as:


set TESTING_IN_BUILD_TREE 1

and then that can be checked; simple, quick, efficient, clear.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]