This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: One version number, &c, take two
- From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- To: zack at codesourcery dot com
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 09:25:09 -0500
- Subject: Re: One version number, &c, take two
- References: <87y8cxfep0.fsf@codesourcery.com>
> The patch adds three files in the toplevel config/ directory.
> GCC-BASE-VER contains the base version number of the compiler.
> DATESTAMP contains the tree datestamp in the usual YYYYMMDD format;
> it is empty in a release tarball.
Shouldn't that be GCC-DATESTAMP? The toplevel is shared between a
number of otherwise independent projects.
Plus the usual complaint about putting gcc-specific files in a shared
toplevel directory. Any reason why these can't be
$(srcdir)/gcc/DATESTAMP et al?